Back to Loch Ness Reflections
It is fair to say that no visitor
to Loch Ness passes by without some sense of expectation and many would hold that a predisposition to see monsters
is, in itself, a sufficient explanation for the controversy
surrounding this enigmatic expanse of water. Indeed, it
was the subject's first author, Rupert
Gould (1934) who discussed what he called "expectant
attention". However, it was to be thirty years before
sightings phenomena were properly investigated. In some
ways this research was to provide verification for some
quite bizarre experiences and to confirm that there was
indeed something special about Loch Ness.
Definition
Bearing the foregoing in mind, perhaps the broadest "sighting" may be,"anything " seen at Loch Ness which the observer does not recognise".
Some may seek explanation; others find revelation within
the experience. For some, a sighting may be a life-altering
event.
There are over a thousand recorded
sightings of the Loch Ness Monster. Most fall within
the stereotypes of a multi-humped "sea-serpent"
and the long-necked "plesiosaur". We owe the
record to the collections of authors beginning with Gould
himself, followed by Constance
Whyte (1957), Tim
Dinsdale (1961) and finally to the efforts of
organised research, most notably by the Loch
Ness Investigation (LNI). By the time the LNI
closed down in 1972, after a decade of intensive camera
surveillance, the human testimony was overwhelming.
The photographic vigil however, had demonstrated the variety of illusion
that the loch was capable of. As photographic coverage
increased, the staff became aware of sighting reports,
which the expedition observers, with their optical equipment
and increasing experience, were able to explain. Raynor
(1999).
The volume
of eyewitness testimony was still regarded as impressive and indeed, led to the underwater photography decade of
the seventies and to some extent, even the sonar decade
of the eighties. However, it was now recognised that there
were a number of different categories of sighting report
and that the monster of popular expectation represented
an amalgam of different causes. This helped to focus and
rationalise the expectations of the investigators themselves.
In the nineties, the indirect scientific examination
of the environment brought this process to a culmination,
which even included some field experiments on the psychology
of perception (Shine
1993, p277).
The following "Key" does not explain all monster sightings, particularly some of the early "close encounters" but
it does represent the known background to investigations in the latter three decades of the 20th century.
Visitors to Loch Ness may find it of interest. The pictures
are mainly from misleading monsters" section, of the Loch Ness
2000 Exhibition in Drumnadrochit. Further illustrations
are from the collection of Richard Carter and other individuals.
We would
very much welcome additions to the Key, based on individual
experiences and any pictures which may illustrate them.
Needless to say, we would be even more interested in sightings
which might not be explained in these ways.
Click the links for more on each sighting below. |
1.
In
any surface conditions the observer takes a photograph of Loch Ness. On processing the film, an object is seen
for the first time, often in the form of a head and neck. |
2.
In
nearly calm conditions, one or more dark changing shapes are seen on the surface of the water. |
3.
In
a facing cross loch wind, which does not often create
large waves, even if quite strong; one or more solid
humps break surface, and head towards the observer leaving
a broad wash. The hump then submerges and the wash subsides. |
4.
In a
strong and usually cross loch wind, where waves are only
evident towards the shore opposite to the one from which
the wind is blowing, a violent water disturbance is seen.
Spray is thrown high into the air before the disturbance
subsides. |
5.
In
windy conditions, particularly after the rivers have been
in spate, a series of dark, possibly irregular objects,
are seen in line within a streak of foam, which might
appear as a wake. |
6.
The
observer sees an object for in excess of 30min. It
is not generally seen to surface. It is sometimes initially
thought to be a log or other debris but is then seen to
behave in an unexpected manner with regard to the wind.
It might move in a calm, maintain its position in spite
of the wind and waves, move at some angle to the wind,
change direction or even move directly against the wind.
There is seldom a wake. After the initial excitement, the observer often
loses interest and moves on, since the object does not
submerge. |
7.
While
driving along the loch, a dark hump is seen fairly close
inshore and is then obscured. When the view clears,
the object has gone. |
8.
It may
partially submerge as it enters the dark reflection of the
opposite shore. A rhythmic splashing may be seen at
the forward end. |
9.
A fast
moving and very large plume of spray is seen at long range. Only recorded from the mid eighties. |
10.
In
calm weather, a series of massive humps are seen;
from one to many. There may be nothing to see in front
or behind. The humps may move with an undulating motion
or not and may submerge. Spray may be seen at the sides.
A wash may break on the shore. Usually there is no boat
in sight. |
11.
In
calm weather a dark hump is seen, staying for a while
in one place, sometimes with a cycling or rotational motion.
It may move off and submerge. |
12.
A
pillar like object shoots up to a height of at least 2ms. and immediately submerges. Usually seen from a boat or
close to the shore but in calm weather it may be seen
from any height. |
13.
In
calm weather, a neck about 1.5ms. high, sometimes with
a hump, moves and submerges. It may resurface. It
may be observed through binoculars, which may well strengthen
the judgement of height. |
14.
In
calm weather, a head and neck, followed at some distance
by a variably shaped hump is seen. Sometimes it proceeds
in spurts, leaving a wake. This is usually seen at quite
long range from a low observation point but may be nearer
if the observer is high up. |
15.
In
calm weather, a narrow V wash develops, with or without
a dark object being seen. It moves rapidly with spray
and commotion before submerging.
|
16.
A
very fast moving series of dark shapes, humps or coils
are seen, generally moving along the length of the loch.
No wash is seen. |
17.
A large,
dark hump is seen on the surface which persists even
when waves are present. It slowly changes shape. It may
disappear into the dark reflection of the opposite shore.
|
18.
A
large head or hump emerges at quite close range. It
is clearly an animal, sometimes with a fish in its mouth.
A few seagulls often accompany it. It may be described
as "seal like"
|
19.
A
head and neck is seen. There are two short horns on
the head. |
20.
A
series of very sinuous humps are seen, with very tight
coils. Sometimes a head and neck appears. |
21.
A few very white and luminous humps are seen towards the shore opposite. There is a house across the water.
Back to Loch Ness Reflections
This page copyright Shine, LNP
|